Service
Landing pages built around one action, and measured against it
A landing page is not a short website. It is one page with one job, and everything that does not serve that job is actively costing you — a navigation bar on a paid landing page is a set of exits you paid for the click to reach.
- Starting from
- $40
- Timeline
- 2 days
- Proof
- 3 live sites
- Aftercare
- 30 days
What landing page development actually means
A landing page is a single page built for a single action, usually the destination of an advertisement, an email or a specific search. Everything on it either moves the reader toward that action or is costing you, and that constraint is what makes it a different discipline from building a website.
The most common failure is not design and not speed. It is message match: the ad promised one thing, the page opens with something adjacent, and the reader spends their first two seconds working out whether they are in the right place. Fixing that costs nothing and outperforms every visual change anyone will suggest.
Who this is for
- Businesses running paid campaigns that currently point at a home page
- Companies launching one product, offer or event who need a page for it now
- Services with a single high-value conversion — a consultation, a quote, a booking
- Anyone who wants to test an offer before committing to building a full site
- Businesses whose main site cannot be changed quickly enough to keep up with campaigns
Who it is not for
Saying this out loud costs me some enquiries and saves both of us the ones that would have gone wrong. If you are on this list, I will tell you in the first reply rather than after a deposit.
- Businesses that need a full website and are hoping one page will substitute. It will not, and it will look like what it is
- Complex products requiring genuine research and comparison before purchase
- Anyone without a defined offer. The page cannot be built until the offer exists
- Campaigns with no tracking and no budget to measure, since the page then cannot be judged
The problems it solves
- Paid traffic landing on a home page
- A dedicated page matching the ad promise, so the reader is not asked to navigate to what they were sold.
- Three competing calls to action
- One action, chosen deliberately. Competing actions reliably convert worse than any one of them alone.
- A hero image pushing the offer below the fold
- The offer and the action are visible on a phone without scrolling.
- Slow pages burning ad budget
- Static HTML with no framework runtime, because you have already paid for the click before the page loads.
- No idea what the conversion rate is
- Tracking configured before launch, so the first campaign produces data rather than an anecdote.
- Objections never addressed
- The structure handles the objections that actually stop people, in the order readers raise them.
What you get
- One page, one conversion action, agreed in writing before the design starts
- Above-the-fold offer and call to action visible on a phone without scrolling
- Conversion-focused structure: problem, proof, objection handling, action
- Form or booking flow with server-side validation and spam protection that is not a CAPTCHA wall
- Sub-second render on 4G — no framework runtime, no render-blocking third-party scripts
- Conversion tracking wired up, so the page can be judged rather than admired
- Thank-you page and confirmation email, because the flow does not end at submit
- A/B-ready structure if you intend to test variants later
What is included in the starting price
Everything below is in the $40 figure. Nothing here is quoted as an extra once the build is underway, which is the point of publishing it.
- One page with one defined conversion action, agreed before design begins
- Offer and call to action above the fold on a 360px screen
- Conversion-focused structure: promise, proof, objections, action
- Form or booking flow with server-side validation and spam protection
- Sub-second render on 4G — no framework runtime, no render-blocking third-party script
- Conversion tracking configured and tested before launch
- Thank-you page and confirmation email
- Mobile-first responsive build tested on a real handset
- 30 days of snag fixes after go-live
What costs extra, and why
A quote that omits these is not cheaper — it is less honest. Each one is real work that someone has to do, and pretending otherwise is how a fixed price becomes a negotiation in week two.
- Copywriting
- Structure and editing are included. Writing the offer from nothing is separate, and it is the highest-leverage work on the page.
- Additional variants for A/B testing
- Quoted per variant. Worth doing once you have enough traffic to reach significance and not before.
- Campaign management
- I build the page. Running and optimising the advertising is a different specialism.
- Custom illustration or video
- Commissioned separately where the offer genuinely needs it.
- Integration with a CRM or email platform
- Straightforward where the API is documented, and quoted per platform.
How the work runs
- Define the action. One action. Call, book, buy or enquire. A page with three equal calls to action converts worse than any one of them alone.
- Structure the argument. Offer, proof, objections, action — in that order, because that is the order the reader raises them.
- Build. Static HTML and Tailwind. Landing pages are where page weight costs the most, since half your traffic arrives on paid clicks you have already paid for.
- Instrument. Conversion tracking before launch, not after the first campaign has already spent its budget unmeasured.
- Launch and read the numbers. The page reports a conversion rate within a week. That number, not an opinion about the design, decides what changes next.
Day by day
2 days from the day scope is signed off. Published as a schedule rather than a promise of speed — you should be able to tell on day three whether a build is on track.
| When | What happens |
|---|---|
| Day 1 | Define the single action, the message match against the ad, and the structure of the argument. Copy signed off. |
| Day 2 | Build, instrument tracking, test on a real handset, then launch with the thank-you flow verified end to end. |
| Days 3–32 | Snag window. The first week of live data usually raises one or two changes worth making. |
The technology
Deliberately boring, and that is the feature. A stack another developer can pick up is worth more to you than one that impresses other developers.
- Markup
- Static HTML. A landing page is where every kilobyte is paid for twice — once in ad spend, once in bounce
- Styling
- Tailwind CSS, purged, inlined where it measurably helps first render
- Forms
- PHP with server-side validation and a honeypot, rather than a CAPTCHA that costs conversions
- Tracking
- Server-side or cookieless where possible, so consent banners do not eat the data
- Hosting
- Static hosting or your existing server. Nothing here needs a specialist landing page platform
What it integrates with
- Google Ads and Meta conversion tracking
- Email platforms and CRMs with a documented API
- Calendar and booking tools where the conversion is an appointment
- Stripe, where the action is a direct purchase or deposit
- WhatsApp click-to-chat, which converts strongly in several markets
- Privacy-respecting analytics that survive a consent banner
What I need from you
Short list, and the first item matters most. Projects do not usually slip because the code was hard — they slip because a decision waited a week.
- The offer, stated plainly, including the price or the reason there is not one
- The ad or email the page is the destination for, so the message can actually be matched
- Proof: testimonials, results, credentials — whatever a sceptical reader would want
- The three objections you hear most often on the phone
- Access to the ad account for conversion tracking, or someone who has it
Content and photography
The copy is the page. Design decisions on a landing page are mostly about not getting in the way, and the single largest gain available on almost every underperforming page is making the first sentence match the promise the visitor clicked.
Write the objections down before writing anything else. Every reason someone gives on the phone for not proceeding is a section the page needs, and the page that addresses four real objections beats the beautiful one that addresses none. That list comes from you — it is the part of the work I cannot do without your sales experience.
Performance standards
Targets, not aspirations — measured before handover on a throttled mobile connection rather than on a fast laptop.
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Largest Contentful Paint | Under 2.5s on a mid-range Android over 4G, measured in the field rather than on my laptop |
| Interaction to Next Paint | Under 200ms — which mostly means shipping less JavaScript rather than reordering it |
| Cumulative Layout Shift | Under 0.1: every image carries width and height, fonts have metric-matched fallbacks |
| Total page weight | Budgeted before the build, not discovered after it |
Accessibility standards
| Standard | WCAG 2.2 AA as the build target, tested rather than asserted |
|---|---|
| Keyboard | Every interactive element reachable and operable without a mouse, with visible focus |
| Contrast | Text at 4.5:1, interface elements and icons at 3:1, checked with a contrast tool not by eye |
| Motion | Anything animating over five seconds gets a pause control — WCAG 2.2.2 is a Level A requirement |
| Forms | Real labels, errors described in text next to the field, no colour-only signalling |
| Why it matters commercially | The European Accessibility Act has applied to consumer e-commerce since June 2025, and the obligation sits with the business selling, not the agency that built it |
This site is built to the same standard it sells, and the accessibility statement lists what is conformant and what is not — which is the part most statements leave out.
Security practices
| Transport | HTTPS enforced in a single redirect hop, HSTS enabled |
|---|---|
| Headers | CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy and COOP set |
| Database | Prepared statements everywhere. Not "mostly" — everywhere |
| Input | Validated server-side, because client-side validation is a convenience and not a control |
| Secrets | Environment variables, never in the repository, never in a JavaScript bundle |
| SPF, DKIM and DMARC aligned so your order confirmations reach inboxes |
The SEO included in every build
Not an upsell. A site that launches unindexed is a shop with the shutters down, and the work below is cheap during a build and expensive afterwards because the fixes are structural.
| Rendering | Content present in the HTML without JavaScript execution, so every crawler and answer engine can read it |
|---|---|
| Indexation | One canonical per page, generated XML sitemap, robots.txt that does not block what it should not |
| Structured data | A linked JSON-LD graph — Organization, WebSite, page type and the commercial type that fits |
| AI crawlers | Access verified per user-agent before launch, because a host can 403 GPTBot before robots.txt is read |
| Search Console | Verified and the sitemap submitted at launch, so the site goes live indexed rather than as a blank shell |
Ownership and handover
You own everything: the domain registered to you, hosting in your account, code in a repository you control, and the payment provider account in your business name. Credentials are handed over as they are created rather than at the end.
A supplier who resists this is protecting recurring revenue rather than your interests. If you want the reasoning in full, including how to check your current site, there is a guide on it.
Aftercare and what happens after launch
Thirty days of snag fixes are included. A snag is something that does not work as scoped — not a new feature, and the difference is written down before launch rather than argued about after it.
You also get written handover documentation aimed at whoever maintains the site next, which may well not be me. That is deliberate: the test of a good handover is whether another developer could take over without calling me, and on my projects they can.
Ongoing maintenance
Optional, monthly, cancellable. Nothing here is required to keep what you paid for.
| Retainer | From | Covers |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | $50/month | Software, plugin and dependency updates; Automated backups with restore tested quarterly; Uptime monitoring with alerting |
| SEO retainer | $80/month | Monthly technical crawl and fix cycle; Search Console monitoring and issue resolution; Content briefs based on your real query data |
Payment terms
| Working hours | Mon–Fri, 09:00–18:00 PKT (UTC+5). That overlaps 05:00–14:00 UK time and 00:00–09:00 US Eastern. |
|---|---|
| Response time | Within one business day, always. If I will be unreachable for longer, you know before it happens. |
| Meetings | Google Meet or Zoom, scheduled in your timezone. I will take an early or late call to reach you — that is my problem to solve, not yours. |
| Language | All work, documentation and communication in English. |
| Payment | 40% deposit, 60% on completion. Bank transfer or Wise. Invoices issued for your records. |
| Currency | Quoted in USD by default. GBP, CAD or EUR on request. |
How this compares to the alternatives
Including the routes that do not involve me, because a comparison that only flatters the author is not a comparison.
| Route | Cost | What you trade |
|---|---|---|
| Send ads to the home page | Free | Conversion rate, usually by a large multiple |
| Landing page builder subscription | Monthly, forever | Page weight, a platform you cannot leave, and a URL on their domain |
| This build | Starting from $40 | Two days and a clear offer, in exchange for a page you own outright |
| Agency landing page | Four figures | Budget, in exchange for copywriting and campaign strategy included |
What could go wrong, and how it is handled
- The offer is not actually defined
- Surfaces on day one. The page cannot be built around an action nobody has chosen.
- Copy is not ready
- Copy is the bottleneck on nearly every landing page. Flagged at scope, and the date moves rather than the quality.
- Not enough traffic to judge the page
- A conversion rate on forty visits is noise. You are told what volume is needed before drawing conclusions.
- Tracking blocked by consent tooling
- Checked before launch. A page you cannot measure is a page you cannot improve.
Live builds you can open
Every project below is live right now. Nothing here is a mockup, a concept piece or a template screenshot, and the build fails if any of these URLs stops responding.
TraderGrowz
Designed and built a responsive multi-page website for a Canada-based trading brand.
tradergrowz.ca ↗Man & Van Hire
Responsive booking-style site for a UK man-and-van removals and moving-hire service.
man-and-van-hire.co.uk ↗Painting & Decorating
Responsive website for a professional painting and decorating service, with project galleries and quote requests.
painting-and-decorating.com ↗Case studies
What the brief was, what I built and the decisions worth explaining. No invented traffic figures — every number on this site is one I can evidence.
What to measure after launch
A site with no measurement is a site nobody can improve. These are the numbers worth watching, in the order they matter.
- Conversion rate, which is the only metric the page exists to move
- Cost per acquisition, if the traffic is paid
- Bounce rate against the previous destination, as a message-match signal
- Scroll depth, which shows where the argument loses people
- Form abandonment by field, which usually indicts one specific question
- Time to first byte and Largest Contentful Paint, since paid traffic is unforgiving of slow pages
Common mistakes in this kind of project
Every one of these has been found on a real site, several of them on this one before it was rebuilt.
- Full site navigation on a paid landing page
- Every link is an exit you bought the click to avoid.
- A headline that does not match the ad
- The most expensive two seconds on the internet, and the cheapest thing to fix.
- Asking for eleven form fields
- Every field costs conversions. Ask for what you need to make the next contact and nothing more.
- No proof anywhere on the page
- Claims without evidence read as marketing, and readers discount them automatically.
- Launching without conversion tracking
- Spends real budget generating data nobody can read.
Glossary
Terms that come up in quotes and get nodded at rather than asked about.
- Message match
- How closely the page reflects the promise that produced the click. The largest single lever available.
- Above the fold
- Visible before scrolling. On a phone, roughly 600 pixels.
- Conversion rate
- The share of visitors who complete the action. Judge it per traffic source, never blended.
- Honeypot
- A hidden form field that only bots fill in. Blocks spam without a CAPTCHA that costs real conversions.
- A/B test
- Two versions served at random and compared. Needs enough traffic to be meaningful.
- Cost per acquisition
- Ad spend divided by conversions. The number that decides whether a campaign continues.
Guides on this subject
Free, ungated, and written from client work. If reading one convinces you I know what I am doing, the enquiry follows on its own.
Questions people ask before hiring
- What makes a landing page high-converting?
- Matching the promise the visitor clicked on, then removing everything that is not that promise. Most underperforming landing pages fail on message match — the ad said one thing, the page opens with something adjacent — and no amount of design work fixes that.
- Should a landing page have navigation?
- For a paid campaign, no. Every navigation link is an exit you bought the click to avoid. For an organic landing page it is a judgement call, because a visitor who is not ready to convert should be able to keep reading rather than bounce.
- How fast can you build a landing page?
- Two days once the copy is signed off. Copy is the bottleneck on nearly every landing page project — the build is short precisely because the page is small, and the thinking about the offer is where the time actually goes.
- Can you build landing pages that match my existing brand?
- Yes. If a design system or brand guide exists, the page uses it. If it does not, the page uses your existing site as the reference so the visitor does not feel they have been sent somewhere unrelated.
Every other question I get asked → · or just ask me directly
Landing page development by location
Same fixed scope and the same $40 starting price, priced in the local currency with that country's tax and data-protection terms set out in full.
- Landing page development Ealing
- Landing page development Wexford
- Landing page development Mississauga
- Landing page development Philadelphia
- Landing page development Parramatta
- Landing page development Abu Dhabi
- Landing page development Dammam
- Landing page development Rawalpindi
- Landing page development Gurgaon
- Landing page development Woodlands
- Landing page development Centurion
- Landing page development Dusseldorf
- Landing page development Bordeaux
Other services
Need landing page development?
Send the brief and you get a reply within one business day — either questions, or a scoping call. If your project is not something I should take on, I will say so then.
- Response
- Replies within 1 business day
- Hours
- Mon–Fri, 09:00–18:00 PKT — overlaps 05:00–14:00 UK, 00:00–09:00 US Eastern
- Booking
- Booking projects from October 2026